Previous Entry | Next Entry

Security Theatre

  • 26th Jan, 2012 at 10:29 AM
Mrs. Slocombe
So, I am safely in Colorado Springs and have had a decent night's sleep. The journey was long, arduous and punctuated with some good beer (Jacob Leinenkugel Sunset Wheat is a nice, refreshing, full-bodied American Wheat. Lovely).

So far, I have managed to avoid making a Decision about perv scanners, because most airports route the premium passengers around them (I have Flying Blue Gold status, which entitles me to queue jump). But transferring at ATL makes it unavoidable. And when it came to it, there was no decision-making involved. I just said "no".

I wasn't expecting it, but what I was wearing was only slightly more than I planned to be wearing for the serious pat-down anyhow. It's an outfit designed to embarrass the person doing the pat-down by making it perfectly clear how ridiculous it is. It consists of a too-thin, slightly too small, stretchy camisole; too thin, slightly too small (but very comfy) leggings and nothing underneath it (with the clothing that covers this in the carry-on bag). I am not small, and this is not a good look. It's also almost impossible to hide anything underneath it and nothing is left to the imagination.

Anyway, I was dressed for comfort and was wearing leggings, a T-shirt and knickers (which should have been changed en-route, but I forgot. Schade). I had just come off a 9.5 hour flight, after a 1.5 hour flight and no time at Paris for a shower. I was really looking forward to the showers in the Delta lounge at this point.

They were very polite about my refusal, and almost agreed with my point that dealing with one cancer per life is more than enough. But it seems the fiercely independent Southerners are in fact a bunch of sheep who cower to government at the slightest thing. It seems they're not used to people saying no, and it took some time for them to find someone to do the pat down. In that time, a hot flush came on, guaranteeing that I was sweaty, smelly and unpleasant to be near, even if I hadn't been to begin with.

Eventually, after much awkward small talk, an attractive, rounded, African-American woman came along wearing the same sort of white vinyl glove the Sisters give out to women who have sex with women. I did not mention this. She enquired as to whether I wanted a private screening, and I pointed out that such things ought to have as many witnesses as possible. She asked if I had anywhere sore or painful to touch, and I reminded her that I had just got off a 9.5 hour flight and therefore much of me was painful to touch but I like that kind of thing so it was a bit moot. I indicated the really sore bit, just to keep her happy.

She went through the procedure, explaining it all veryveryfast, and then again when I asked her to speak a little more slowly as I am a Foreigner. She used euphemism to describe various places. And then she did the pat-down, and seemed terribly embarrassed by the whole thing. I, on the other hand, had found my reserve of British Stiff Upper Lip and remained utterly calm. She had a good look at the soles of my feet (probably filthy as I was barefoot on the plane for the bulk of the flight).

And you know what, it wasn't anything as bad as what I'd been led to expect, and definitely not thorough at all. You saw the bit up there about it being nearly impossible to hide anything under my screening outfit? Well, I have boobs. Had I been wearing a bra, it would have been an H-cup one. She didn't even go anywhere near underneath my boobs - a shame, that area gets particularly minging with the hot flushes. Nor would the rapescanner have spotted anything secreted there. Proof it's all just security theatre which would break down completely if Americans just adopted the British style of polite contempt for government authority.

ETA: And while this was going on, they scanned my luggage as usual, except I not only forgot to transfer the toothpaste into the clear bag which already contained my prescription medication, I forgot to take that bag out and present it. And they didn't notice.

Comments

( 20 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]von_krag wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 17:35 (UTC)
Good on you. This absurd & bad theater is just one reason I don't fly. If I do I'll dress in a wife beater tee & bike shorts & let the flab & zippers run and play.
[info]feorag wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 17:42 (UTC)
Also, based on comments on [info]autopope's journal, being totally unembarrassed by the whole procedure seems to be the best way to make the TSA person embarrassed by it.
[info]fledgist wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 21:51 (UTC)
It might. They do get off on making you feel small.
[info]andrewducker wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 18:10 (UTC)
Nice one. I suspect that in a similar situation I would have put up with it. Should it happen, I will try and think of your example, and then follow it.
[info]bohemiancoast wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 18:15 (UTC)
I of course have been patted down rather regularly during the course of my now-abandoned career and I've often thought that if I ever fancied smuggling, I could secrete several kilos of contraband in my cleavage without serious risk of it being detected through my BOILERPLATED BRASSIERE.
[info]spacelem wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 18:48 (UTC)
Huzzah for polite contempt for government authority!!!

Sadly the last time I had such a check was under pretty emotionally stressful circumstances, and I was unable to do likewise (instead I had a bit of a panic attack, and shrieked loudly when they touched my ticklish bits). Next time however...
[info]henry_the_cow wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 18:49 (UTC)
Yes, good on you.

I have to be patted down every time I fly, as my pacemaker isn't allowed through the security gates. From your description, it sounds as if the American pat downs are a little more intrusive.

The whole security palaver at the airport definitely encourages me to prefer the train if I'm travelling within the UK (even more than I'd prefer it anyway).
[info]autopope wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 19:15 (UTC)
The American pat-downs are incompetently designed to embarrass people with body-phobia into submitting to the mandated body scanners instead. There's an overtone of "stand in this corner while we shout embarrassingly that we've got an opt-out and need someone over here to deal with the naughty child" -- it's really rather peurile.

Anyone who has ever been a member of a naturist club will find the whole thing rather tedious, but it is possible to extract some mild amusement by the chaos that ensues when one does the permitted-but-unwanted thing.
[info]melopoeia wrote:
31st Jan, 2012 22:25 (UTC)
the whole thing is tedious, but it would be rather less than tedious if I were trans. Especially in certain parts of the country. Because either way you're likely to encounter a problem, then.

Happily for me the most I've had is an entertaining time to chuckle over when the TSA guy called me sir, *very* nervously, given that I was crossdressed, as the monitor told him that what was underneath my clothing was not what he must have expected.
I'm not sure why he was nervous, but it allowed me to laugh at my first trip through one of those scanners.

Yes, it is the better option to be frisked, but I tend to opt not to feel ill and shaky for an hour. And I've only had to go through the scanners three times so far, as for a while they removed them from my home airport after a protest of braver folks opting out during a holiday travel season.



[info]feorag wrote:
31st Jan, 2012 23:08 (UTC)
To me, the scanners are the things that make me shaky and ill just thinking about them. It's the surreptitious nature of the things, plus one variety has now been demonstrated to cause cancer (and the other is a big unknown, but there is theoretically no problem).

They want to see me naked, but would arrest me if I took my clothes off.
[info]melopoeia wrote:
31st Jan, 2012 23:19 (UTC)
I get that completely. And the idiocy of the whole security theatre never fails to infuriate me.

At least what you can tolerate more inconveniences them, meanwhile my similarly somewhat forced choice is what they'd prefer, because it is the path of least resistance.

In any case, I hope you can avoid similar ridiculous obstacles on your further travels within the US. And elsewhere they may be catching on.

I've a trip coming up in April and I do not look forward to that crap again.
[info]kevin_standlee wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 18:56 (UTC)
Good for you! I have thus far been able to avoid the porno-scanners myself, and I've significantly cut back on my air travel to boot. (For instance, I'm taking the train to Worldcon this year as I did to go to Montreal.) Mind you, statistically I'm in much more danger from the increased driving, so if the Terrorists' purpose was to kill more Americans, having terrified Americans make it so unpleasant that more and more people drive instead of fly has achieved their purpose, albeit less spectacularly than most people expect, in terms of increased individual deaths rather than Mass Destruction.
[info]thewayne wrote:
19th Feb, 2012 19:49 (UTC)
Don't count on trains being safe from scanners in the U.S.: TSA wants to expand security screening to bus and train stations. So basically the only way around them will be to drive or fly private planes. And driving won't be enough in some areas as they've developed drive-through backscatter machines and deployed them in the U.S. Southwest, one is about 100 miles from where I live.
[info]kevin_standlee wrote:
19th Feb, 2012 19:57 (UTC)
I know, although I've been so far pleased at how Amtrak pushed back against TSA's ham-handed security theatre. I'm wondering how long it will be until they decide that sidewalks are a form of "transportation" and announce that their mandate is to demand Your Papers Please randomly on any street, anywhere, anytime, for no reason, and that pesky constitution be dammed. And whether they'll get away with it when they try it. :(
[info]thewayne wrote:
19th Feb, 2012 20:41 (UTC)
The Obama administration argued that your movements in public are not private when they were defending warrantless GPS vehicle tracking. Fortunately the Supreme Court didn't buy that argument.

We actually have a form of Papers, Please in New Mexico: random DUI checkpoints. All vehicles stop, everyone has to produce license & registration.

Such an inconvenient piece of paper, the Constitution & Bill of Rights.
[info]saare_snowqueen wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 19:01 (UTC)
Good for you. Wonderful descriptive writing - excellent strategy.
[info]fledgist wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 21:52 (UTC)
As I pointed out to Charlie, you were all of 9 miles from me while undergoing this. Pity you didn't have a real stop here.
[info]redbird wrote:
26th Jan, 2012 23:50 (UTC)
Thanks for the report.

I opted for the radiation thing at Dorval (YUL) last week, because I'm healing a tattoo and didn't want anyone touching that part of my arm. (Of course, it being Dorval, the staff were polite and Canadian.)
[info]marypcb wrote:
27th Jan, 2012 15:39 (UTC)
I'm happy with the millimetric nudiescanner they have at SFO - doesn't have the radiation issues and I've seen the output, it looks like a bad UFO picture - but I shall be asking for a grope if we hit an airport with a backscatter machine.

I have lip salve or some other small 'liquid' in my bag every time I go through security and don't remember to put it in the baggie - accidentally, I think, although I have a bolshie subconscious. On recent security checks I've forgotten to take off my fitbit and the corsory patdown failed to reveal that I'd tucked my phone in my bra while in the queue and forgotten to take it out. My other pocket, as I call it...
[info]melopoeia wrote:
31st Jan, 2012 22:12 (UTC)
Kudos on getting through the screening ok and standing up to them.

So far, when I've faced the choice, I've always opted for the scanner because the one time I was ever patted down (vs wanded, I can tolerate wanded) I felt horrible for an hour, although I'm aware it was likely a poor choice given family health history.

hoping to see you at Boskone. (and because you may not know my lj name, we found a cache together near a pub here)
( 20 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

squirrel
[info]feorag
Feòrag NicBhrìde
The Drey

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow